Mojo · B2C · social media video maker
Check 7-day cancellations before keeping a higher price that won on early revenue
Rejected a winning higher price after a yearlong model showed lost long-term revenue
What they did
What happened
In their words
How Mojo Increased ARPU 60% In Just Five Months – Michal Parizek, Mojo
David BarnardDid you look back on some of those experiments and see the impact on retention? So did you knowingly sacrifice some long-term revenue for that quick return on ad spend?
Michal ParizekTypically where we look at retention or at least something like a proxy to retention, we use typically seven-day cancellation rate as a proxy for retention rate or for renewal rate, what it could look like. And we typically look at this proxy when we did price testing because I've seen data that, do you have any tests at different prices, particularly the higher prices? Usually you see higher cancellation rates and lower renewal rates at high prices. So it's quite reasonable. And I remember a couple of tests where we actually tested a different price and the price actually, mostly a high price, actually turned out to be the winner on the new revenue, but when we actually modeled having the new price for a year long, calculating a bit long-term revenue, and we saw that we would actually sacrifice in the long-term mainly because the renewal rates just dropped because of the proxy.
Michal ParizekSeven-day cancellation rate just was way higher than for the baseline price. So then we decided not to do that and kept the original price, and sacrifice a bit of less new revenue, but I think more new revenue in the long term.
David BarnardOne of the things I talked about in another one of these State of Subscription Apps podcast was how a lot of times experiment results don't stack. So you get a 10% win here, and a 20% win there, and a 15% win here, and then you look at it at the end and you actually haven't raised average revenue per user by the sum total of all those experiments. You're getting 10% here but losing 5% there, and getting 20% here but losing 10% there. What do you …
Get tactics like this every Monday
New tactics from the week's founder interviews, each linked to where it was said.
More from this episode
- Show only the yearly plan first; tuck monthly behind a 'view all plans' buttonYearly plan uptake up ~15-20 points; one of three tests behind a 60% ARPU lift
- Show the yearly plan as about $10 a month next to the $25 monthly planNew revenue +10% in the US and +30-40% in Brazil and Mexico
- Price below the US-equivalent in Brazil and Mexico instead of just converting currencyLower prices won; part of the 60% ARPU lift, no separate number
- Judge every paywall and price test on revenue per user in the first 7 daysChosen to shorten payback and fund more ad spend; worked well per guest
- Retest each winning paywall in every key market before rolling it outSeveral winners shipped only in some markets; ARPU of new cohorts kept rising
- Use a long scrolling paywall with reviews and a free vs pro comparison in JapanNew revenue +20% in Japan; failed in the US, where a clean video paywall won
- Show free users a paywall when they open the app, at most once a week~15% of new revenue from existing users; no complaints in reviews or support
- Keep lots of features and content free on purposeOnly ~50% of payers convert on day one vs ~80% industry-wide
- Run separate paywall tests at once in US, Europe and Latin America every week or twoSignificant results in 1-2 weeks per bucket; enabled the 60% ARPU lift in five months
Tags: cancellation-rate, renewal-proxy, price-test, ltv-model