GTM Sauce

Flamme · B2C · couples app

Launch alongside a TechCrunch Startup Battlefield feature

800% organic growth in one month; stopped by a trademark letter

Mixedpr-launch

What they did

Launched the first version (Sparks, a date planner) in October 2022 while being featured on TechCrunch as a Startup Battlefield company; no TikTok or paid. Follow-up AI relaunch got TechCrunch (Valentine's Day) and LA Times coverage.

What happened

Grew 800% organically in the first month, but the app had 0.8% D30 retention and was pulled after a cease-and-desist; later press didn't fix retention.

In their words

An Nayal - Full App Growth Guide 2026 - How to Make Viral Content to Get Users & Make Your App Retentive

Play from 7:44
7:25

An NayalBut there was nothing at that time for the after part. After you got into a relationship, after you had a partner, after you started, you know, being with someone. So, we decided to build something for the after. We wanted to build something for when people were in a relationship, when they were with each other, when they were facing struggles together, and that is how Flamme was conceptualized.

7:44

An NayalTell you a little fun story about it. We launched the initial version of Flamme, and it was a date planning app. So, it didn't have any of these questions, any of these elements. It was just a app to help couples plan dates together. We released with quite a bang. It was October 2022, we got featured on TechCrunch as a Startup Battlefield company, we were invited to San Francisco. Uh things were going crazy, bro.

8:06

An NayalWe launched, in one month, we grew 800% organically. I I had no idea about TikTok then, no idea about anything else. So we were just going organically really rapidly, and then we were hit by a lawsuit. Like we got a cease-and-desist letter right into my inbox. I wake up in November, things are going really fucking well, and then there's this letter that lands in telling us, "Hey, you got to pull the app down."

8:28

An NayalUh it was a trademark and brand infringement letter which said that because we were using the name Sparks, and there was another player in the dating market which has which had registered the name Spark Networks, that's why we couldn't use their name, and they, you know, we had no choice. Either we could fight it and lose a lot of money doing that or just change the name.

Get tactics like this every Monday

New tactics from the week's founder interviews, each linked to where it was said.

More from this episode

Tags: startup-battlefield, press, launch