GTM Sauce

Practitioner pattern · Thomas Petit (Thomas Petit client that requires 2x immediate return on paid, Thomas Petit marketplace client with lopsided categories, VC-backed startup where Thomas first ran the whole budget)

Test very different ad ideas first, then make variations of whichever gets traction

A rare winner can be 100x and change a company's course

Workedpaid-socialexperimentation

What they did

Don't test 20 variants of one concept. Test radically different concepts, even unpolished: person vs animation, provocative vs bland, strong colours, lots of text, long vs short, open on the app vs on a person. Put ~20 ads in and let the platform pick: the ad getting most spend after 100-200 impressions is the winner (right ~99% of the time). Where a concept gets traction, iterate: reorder scenes, lengthen, swap the person, change one element at a time. Keep off-brand winners running but try to realign them with brand messaging. Don't trust intuition about which ad will win.

What happened

Real winners are game changing (10x-100x); one off-brand ad brought twice the money.
57:40
“One of the most common mistake in creative is people are testing 20 variants of the same concept. Like they're testing over and over the same thing with small variants. You have to test radically different things.”
Thomas Petit
58:04
“Wherever we get a bit of traction, this is where we're going to add layers of let's do variants of this.”
Thomas Petit
55:51
“Like the creative winner is the one that's getting all the spend and”
Thomas Petit

Related topics

Get tactics like this every Monday

New tactics from the week's founder interviews, each linked to where it was said.

More from this episode