GTM Sauce

Tinder · B2C · swipe dating app

Offer three subscription levels and sell extra boosts on top

Former CPO calls it one of the best ways to price consumer apps; no revenue split given

Workedpricingupsell-expansionpaywall

What they did

Instead of one price, Tinder sells Tinder Plus (cheap on-ramp that gets people over the 'penny gap'), Tinder Gold (see who liked you) and Tinder Platinum (more Super Likes/Boosts, message before matching), and layers a la carte microtransactions (Super Likes, Boosts, bundles) on top to catch willingness to pay between and above tiers. Subscriptions give predictable revenue; consumables flex with need. Keep to 2-3 tiers to avoid complexity; the app avoids showing all tiers on one paywall. Few free users buy consumables: subscriptions act as a force multiplier because consumables (get more right-swipes) pair with Gold (see who swiped right). Built organically: one tier launched, learned what users valued, added the next.

What happened

Became Tinder's monetization model; guest says the same subs+microtransactions combo also works in gaming.
Stage
scale
“And so this combination of a subscription set of tiers as well as Microtransaction products turns out to be one of the most optimal ways, especially within consumer to price your product.”
Ravi Mehta
“So I didn't do that deliberately, but it is the case that very few free users actually buy micro transactions. It tends to be that these subscriptions are kind of force multipliers for the micro transactions.”
Ravi Mehta
“And then that cheaper tier is meant to be an on-ramp, find people that are willing to jump the penny gap, get them into a paid product that shows them that they can get a lot more from the experience”
Ravi Mehta

Related topics

Get tactics like this every Monday

New tactics from the week's founder interviews, each linked to where it was said.

More from Tinder

All 22 Tinder tactics

More from this episode