GTM Sauce

uDocz · B2C · study notes app for students

Survey what students would pay, then drop the Pro tier and cut the yearly price

+12% subscriber conversion, +10% net subscription revenue, better margins

Workedpricing

What they did

Starting point: two tiers (Lite, Pro) each with monthly and annual plans; Pro's extra value was licensed publisher ebooks. Instead of A/B testing prices first, run a Van Westendorp survey (at what price is it too expensive, getting expensive, a bargain, too cheap to trust) to get the optimal price range, cut by tier; then a conjoint survey where each user makes 5-10 choices between 2-4 packages of attributes to get marginal willingness to pay per feature. Findings: little extra willingness to pay for Pro over Lite or for annual over monthly, and publisher ebooks had among the lowest willingness to pay. Action: collapse to one tier (Udocz Plus), drop the licensed ebooks, and lower the annual price. Guest's rule: early consumer apps should offer one plan (annual only, or monthly + annual).

What happened

Subscriber conversion +12% and net subscription revenue +10%; removing publisher licensing costs also improved margins and LTV/CAC.
1:16:08
“we saw that the marginal willingness to pay for the Pro plan was very, very small relative to the Lite plan.”
Phil Carter
1:16:55
“what the company ended up doing was streamlining down to a single tier, just getting rid of the Pro tier and only having what they now call Udocz Plus, and then lowering their annual price.”
Phil Carter
1:17:27
“this ended up driving a 12% increase in subscriber conversion and a 10% increase in net subscription revenue.”
Phil Carter

Related topics

Get tactics like this every Monday

New tactics from the week's founder interviews, each linked to where it was said.

More from this episode