B2C · weather app with widgets
How Weather Up grows
12 tactics and 19 figures from 5 interviews.
Weather Up is an indie weather app built around widgets and Apple Watch complications. Its growth has come mostly from free attention, with Apple featuring and press coverage around big updates and almost no paid ads. Long gaps between updates cost it that attention, and much of the founder's effort went into paywall and pricing tests.
- Weather Up made about $100K in 2024 after a big update got Apple and press coverage with almost no ads, then fell to about $50K in 2025 with no updates or advertising.Weather Up
- Holding a Watch app and widgets back for one big 3.0 launch left the app without updates for years; downloads fell to about 15 a day and it lost money for about 18 months.Weather Up
- The founder pitched journalists with a short demo video in Twitter DMs and said it won coverage in TechCrunch, 9to5Mac and MacRumors, but launching the same hour as Apple's DMA news cut the coverage.Weather Up (1)Weather Up (2)
- In a 50/50 paywall test, pre-selecting the $4 monthly plan got about 10% more subscribers than the $40 yearly default, but revenue per user was 60% lower within the first month.Weather Up
- Launching at $40 a year with no sale still drew close to 2,000 subscribers, though the founder believes the price hurt conversion from press traffic.Weather Up
- After AdSense ads brought bad reviews, Weather Up moved to a hard paywall; a push offering 7 free days to people who left it drew few takers and is being replaced by a 7-day reverse trial.Weather Up (1)Weather Up (2)Weather Up (3)
Summary written 2026-10-03 from the tactics below. Figures are as founders stated them.
About Weather Up
- What it is
- Subscription weather app (formerly Weather Atlas); 3.0 added interactive widgets, an Apple Watch app and per-widget weather sources
- Who it's for
- Weather nerds who often already subscribe to other weather apps
- Business model
- subscription
- Pricing
- $4/month; $40/year; single tier with free trial
- Team
- David plus his cousin as rev-share developer partner; Brock did the 3.0 development
- Funding
- bootstrapped
As described in the interviews, not independently verified.
Weather Up's 12 tactics
Weather Up by the numbers
| Metric | Value | Context | Said in |
|---|---|---|---|
| revenue | USD 100K/year approximate | Year of a big update; almost all from Apple features and press, almost no paid ads | App Masters 2026-03-1415:53 |
| revenue | USD 50K/year approximate | No updates and no advertising that year | App Masters 2026-03-1415:53 |
| churn | 70%/year approximate | Share of users churned in 2025 (about the median) | App Masters 2026-03-1415:53 |
| revenue | USD 100K/year approximate | 2024 revenue with zero paid acquisition spend | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-12-2345:25 |
| ad spend | USD 0/year | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-12-2345:25 | |
| revenue | a couple hundred grand approximate | Over roughly the last 5 years | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-09-1817:34 |
| downloads | 15 downloads/day approximate | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2013:17 | |
| profit | losing money for about 18 months, funded from personal income approximate | Weather data API costs exceeded revenue | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2013:17 |
| price | USD 40/year | Annual plan at launch ($4/month monthly plan); guest calls it probably the highest-priced weather subscription | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2032:18 |
| price | USD 4/month | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2051:53 | |
| paying users | 2,000 subscribers approximate | Subscribers from the 3.0 launch paying $40/year (also described as 'thousands') | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-201:01:24 |
| share | 33% approximate | Annual-default arm: share of subscribers who switched to monthly (~800 annual, ~400 monthly) | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2050:41 |
| share | 10% approximate | Monthly-default arm: share who switched to annual (~1,100 monthly, ~100 annual); 'less than 10%' | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2051:53 |
| conversion rate | +4.5% approximate | Monthly-default vs annual-default arm: more trial starts/conversions; later restated as 10% | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2050:41 |
| conversion rate | +10% approximate | Monthly-default arm produced ~10% more subscribers than annual-default arm; statistically significant per guest | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2053:13 |
| ltv | +-60% approximate | Realized LTV of monthly-default arm vs annual-default arm, under one month after launch (before renewals) | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2047:33 |
| churn | 30%/month approximate | Share of launch monthly subscribers who had already turned off auto-renew before the first renewal ('above 30%') | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2049:43 |
| views | 30K–100K people estimate | People who saw the launch press coverage headlines | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2024-03-2057:45 |
| cost | USD 0.1–1per free trial estimate | Estimated server/data cost of each 7-day free trial that does not convert, depending on usage | Sub Club by RevenueCat 2023-08-2321:18 |
Topics
Interviews
- Subscription App Growth Is Getting Brutal (RevenueCat Data Explained) · App Masters · 2026-03-14
- Using Subscription App Benchmarks to Make Better Growth Decisions — Phil Carter, Elemental Growth · Sub Club by RevenueCat · 2024-12-23
- The Advantages of Working On an App You Care About — Christian Selig, Apollo · Sub Club by RevenueCat · 2024-09-18
- Lessons from a Lackluster Launch — David Barnard, Weather Up · Sub Club by RevenueCat · 2024-03-20
- App Store Ethics, Dark Patterns, and Rule-Breakers — Steve P. Young, App Masters · Sub Club by RevenueCat · 2023-08-23